w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: ID attribute value is unique
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2019-11-22 to 2020-01-09.
9 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Instructions
- Consistency with ACT Rules Format
- Rule assumptions
- Implementation data
- Consistent with WCAG
- Remaining open issues
- Other questions or concerns
- Readiness for publishing
1. Instructions
Review the rule ID attribute value is unique and answer the questions in this survey.
If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results |
Details
| Responder | Instructions |
|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | |
| Jonathan Avila | |
| Trevor Bostic | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | |
| Maureen Kraft | |
| Sailesh Panchang | |
| Charu Pandhi | |
| Wilco Fiers | |
| Kathy Eng |
2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 9 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | Yes | |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes | |
| Sailesh Panchang | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
3. Rule assumptions
Are the assumptions acceptable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 9 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | Yes | |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes | |
| Sailesh Panchang | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
4. Implementation data
Is the implementation data correct?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 7 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 2 |
Details
| Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes | |
| Sailesh Panchang | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | Although more implementors would be preferable |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
5. Consistent with WCAG
Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 9 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistent with WCAG | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | Yes | |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes | |
| Sailesh Panchang | Yes | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
6. Remaining open issues
Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | |
| Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | 1 |
| No, there are no open issues. | 7 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Jonathan Avila | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Trevor Bostic | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | In outcome mappings, it states that passed outcomes require further testing. I don't see why. Please add an explicit statement as to why this is necessary. |
| Sailesh Panchang | ||
| Charu Pandhi | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Wilco Fiers | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, there are no open issues. |
7. Other questions or concerns
Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 2 |
| No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 7 |
Details
| Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | - The rule lists technique H94 (no duplicate attributes) as a background reference, but I don’t think it’s relevant for this rule. - Is it planned to use another rule to test that the ID attribute is non-empty? Or should it be included in this rule? |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | The only comment I have is that the pass #4 is an iFrame without an accessible name. Passes should not fail other rules and should be good examples of coding. |
| Trevor Bostic | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Maureen Kraft | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Sailesh Panchang | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Charu Pandhi | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Wilco Fiers | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, I have no further questions or concerns. |
8. Readiness for publishing
Do you think this rule is ready to be published?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | 6 |
| Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 3 |
| No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Deltour | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | If my comment above is accepted, then remove H94 from the background section. |
| Jonathan Avila | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Maureen Kraft | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | In outcome mappings, it states that passed outcomes require further testing. I don't see why. Please add an explicit statement as to why this is necessary. https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1079 |
| Sailesh Panchang | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Charu Pandhi | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | only 1 implementation. Sorry, TT does not include a test for parsing. |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project