W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Rule review: Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com

This questionnaire was open from 2020-03-05 to 2020-03-26.

5 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Instructions
  2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
  3. Rule assumptions
  4. Implementation data
  5. Consistent with WCAG
  6. Remaining open issues
  7. Other questions or concerns
  8. Readiness for publishing

1. Instructions

Review the rule Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property and answer the questions in this survey.

If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Instructions
Patrick Lauke
Wilco Fiers
Trevor Bostic
Mary Jo Mueller
Detlev Fischer

2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format

Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 4
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below. 1

Details

Responder Consistency with ACT Rules FormatComments
Patrick Lauke Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Trevor Bostic I don't know. My questions are documented below. I am having a hard time understanding the expectation. I am wondering if more clarification can be given. Would it break spec to include an image or images that show what exactly is being tested?

The rule name is about orientation of the page not being restricted, but the applicability and expectation are given for specific elements.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes To Trevor's comment - I think the expectation is written as a long, complex sentence. Can it be simplified? I agree that adding an image showing what it means would help.
Detlev Fischer Yes

3. Rule assumptions

Are the assumptions acceptable?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 4
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions are documented below.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Rule assumptionsComments
Patrick Lauke Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Mary Jo Mueller
Detlev Fischer Yes

4. Implementation data

Is the implementation data correct?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 4
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below.
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. 1

Details

Responder Implementation dataComments
Patrick Lauke Yes
Wilco Fiers Yes
Trevor Bostic I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. Is there a reason to link to the stylesheet in failed example 1? We typically include all of the code in the example and its only 3 or 4 lines.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes

5. Consistent with WCAG

Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes 4
No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. 1
I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below.

Details

Responder Consistent with WCAGComments
Patrick Lauke No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. Wondering if the precise "90 degrees" may not offer an escape hatch here that is not necessarily present in the wording of WCAG itself. while admittedly this will be the most common case, what if the rotation is "85 degrees" for whatever reason (maybe to better fit into the different orentation's layout ... it might start off at a very subtle 5 degree angle in landscape, but in portrait may align to a perpendicular layout grid, so only rotated by that amount instead.
Wilco Fiers Yes
Trevor Bostic Yes
Mary Jo Mueller Yes
Detlev Fischer Yes

6. Remaining open issues

Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below.
Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published.
No, there are no open issues. 4

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Remaining open issuesComments
Patrick Lauke
Wilco Fiers No, there are no open issues.
Trevor Bostic No, there are no open issues.
Mary Jo Mueller No, there are no open issues.
Detlev Fischer No, there are no open issues.

7. Other questions or concerns

Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below.
No, I have no further questions or concerns. 4

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Other questions or concernsComments
Patrick Lauke
Wilco Fiers No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Trevor Bostic No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Mary Jo Mueller No, I have no further questions or concerns.
Detlev Fischer No, I have no further questions or concerns.

8. Readiness for publishing

Do you think this rule is ready to be published?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. 2
Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. 3
No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below.

Details

Responder Readiness for publishingComments
Patrick Lauke Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. I would add a failure example where a rotation is already applied to start with in one orientation (e.g. a <div> at a "jaunty angle" of a few degrees) and then rotated further (by equivalent of 90 degrees) in the other orientation.
Wilco Fiers Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.
Trevor Bostic Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. Failed example 1 needs to show code, and we may need to rename the rule.
Mary Jo Mueller Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. It would be great to have an illustration for the expectations.
Detlev Fischer Yes, it is ready to publish as-is.

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Katie Haritos-Shea
  2. David MacDonald
  3. Romain Deltour
  4. Chris Loiselle
  5. Jonathan Avila
  6. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  7. Charles Adams
  8. Kathy Eng
  9. Daniel Montalvo
  10. Todd Libby
  11. Thomas Brunet
  12. Catherine Droege
  13. Suji Sreerama
  14. Shane Dittmar
  15. Nayan Padrai

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.