MBE702 Seminar Evaluation: Bruce Pohlot
Is a Recreational Fishing Reserve Area a Viable Option for Guatemala’s Pacific Coast

The Pacific Sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) is a vital resource to Central American economies along the eastern Pacific Ocean through tourism (recreational catch-and-release sportfisheries) and as retainable bycatch in the commercial (purse seine and longline) fleet. Mortality resulting from capture in commercial fisheries targeting other pelagic species reduces population abundance and negatively impacts economically important recreational catch rates. In this study, we seek to examine the current state of the Guatemala ecosystem for the viability of a recreational fishing reserve area and where this area will have the greatest impact on conservation and access. This objective requires the development of methods to spatially quantify biodiversity and productivity hotspots along the Guatemalan Pacific coast in both the pelagic and demersal ecosystems to better understand the distribution of coastal resources. Further investigation of the oceanographic parameters in the region seeks to examine the physical system acting on such coastal resources causing aggregation and retention within specific biogeographic locations such as the San Jose Canyon. The examination utilizes a combination of hydroacoustic, oceanographic, and trawl survey sampling methods as well as recent sailfish satellite tagging results from the 2018-2019 season. Finally, an exploration of a previous area closure in Costa Rica is examined relative to suggestions made for the Guatemalan study.  

Sign in to Google to save your progress. Learn more
MBE STUDENTS ONLY: C number (to remain anonymous) OR name (to be shared with speaker) - don't put both:
Abstract
1 - 2:  Fails to describe work; inconsistent with talk; grammar and spelling errors.                                                                                                                    3 - 5:  Unclear; uninspiring; few errors.                                                                                                                                                       6 - 8:  Reasonable summary; interesting; minimal errors.                                                                                                                      9 -10: Easy to follow; inspiring text; very consistent with talk; no major errors.
Clear selection
Introduction
1 - 2:  Lack of structure; audience feels lost; provides too much or too little background.                                                                                                      3 - 5:  Difficult to follow; inadequate information.                                                                                                                                      6 - 8:  Coherent; explanations could be improved; adequate information.                                                                                                                                       9 -10: Easy to follow; well structured; provides correct amount of background information for audience.
Clear selection
Methods
1 - 2:  No explanation of methods; audience feels lost.                                                                                                                           3 - 5:  Difficult to follow; insufficient explanation of methods.                                                                                                                                      6 - 8:  Coherent but holes in methodology.                                                                                                                                               9 -10: Methodology clearly explained.
Clear selection
Results (if applicable) and Discussion
1 - 2:  Unable to explain data; presentation of data is poor. Talk lacks conclusions.                                                                                                                                                                      3 - 5:  Incomplete results; graphs used ineffectively. Inadequate conclusions drawn from data.                                                                                                                                                                                                                   6 - 8:  Presentation of results could be improved; adequate graphs. Clear conclusions; demonstrates understanding.                                                                                                                        9 - 10: Great presentation of data; graphs appropriately explained. Well organized discussion; interprets the results in the context of relevant work.
Clear selection
Ability to Communicate Importance of Research
1 - 2:  Unable to communicate importance of research and big picture ideas.                                                                                            3 - 5:  Importance of research unclear and not emphasized.                                                                                                                                                                                                                      6 - 8:  Places the research in the context of big picture ideas but leaves room for improvement.                                                                                        9 - 10:  Strong ability to communicate importance of the research and excites the audience.
Clear selection
Acknowledgements
1 - 2:  Absent.                                                                                                                                                                                                  3 - 5:  Brief or incomplete.                                                                                                                                                                             6 - 8:  Adequate but does not go beyond the minimum.                                                                                                                              9 -10: Well thought out and describe contributions from both funding sources and individuals.
Clear selection
Preparedness and Presentation Skills
1 - 2:  Very rushed; poor voice projection/eye contact; unprepared; reads entirely off slides.                                                                                                3 - 5:  Somewhat rushed; difficult to hear; poor eye contact; somewhat prepared.                                                                                                    6 - 8:  Reasonable pace/voice projection/eye contact; adequate preparation.                                                                                                                                                                                                    9 -10: Appropriate pace/voice projection/eye contact; well prepared; uses slides appropriately for guidance.
Clear selection
Quality of Slides
1 - 2:  Dense text; unreadable figures; color scheme hinders readability.                                                                                             3 - 5:  Occasional use of dense text and unreadable figures; slide organization is poor.                                                                                            6 - 8:  Appealing slide design with appropriate text; readable figures; organized presentation.                                                                                                                                                                                              9 -10: Slides used extremely effectively; creative representation of material; easy to read.
Clear selection
Ability to Answer Questions
1 - 2:  Unable to interpret or answer audience questions.                                                                                                                     3 - 5:  Difficulty answering most questions; fails to demonstrate understanding of topic.                                                                                          6 - 8:  Answers most questions well; adequate understanding of topic.                                                                                                                                                                                            9 -10: Answers all questions clearly and concisely; outstanding understanding of topic.
Clear selection
Comments?
What did you like and/or what could be improved?
Submit
Clear form
Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy