Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REQ 8a: Ensure Audio Description (AD) recommended sound values are dynamic #28

Open
RealJoshue108 opened this issue Nov 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@RealJoshue108
Copy link
Contributor

Filed on behalf of John Paton RNIB (original email to RQTF list https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rqtf/2020Nov/0016.html)

  • Does this mean ensure users can set AD volume independent of main audio?

I'd be interested in the wider use case for this. Would this be a live stream of someone explaining any visuals in a teleconference or an AD option on pre-recorded videos shown in a webinar? Either may run into problems since the live describer in the former example won't have guaranteed gaps in dialogue in which to add descriptions and people may talk over any gaps in dialogue in the latter.

@RealJoshue108 RealJoshue108 self-assigned this Nov 30, 2020
@RealJoshue108
Copy link
Contributor Author

RealJoshue108 commented Dec 2, 2020

(Filing on behalf of @JaninaSajka) who also notes that both audio and text descriptions of video may need independent volume/ EQ adjustment or routing. Need is the same regardless of how speech is generated. This is most likely to come up on well prepared screen share content, eg. a video being shared.

Most especially, we want to ensure the RTC platform doesn't strip captions/descriptions that may have been part of the original video simply because it hasn't provided for transmitting them in a screen share.

We should also call out EQ adjustment, not just volume, for hearing impaired people. We know EQ delivers better results than simply adjusting volume.

@RealJoshue108
Copy link
Contributor Author

RealJoshue108 commented Dec 2, 2020

@JWJPaton @JaninaSajka This looks like new user need / requirements for the section 2.5 Routing and communication channel control.

@RealJoshue108
Copy link
Contributor Author

RealJoshue108 commented Dec 9, 2020

Discussed by RQTF on 9th Dec https://www.w3.org/2020/12/09-rqtf-minutes.html - there is a new user need and any related requirements.

@ruoxiran ruoxiran transferred this issue from w3c/apa Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant