Skip to main content
Log in

Winner and Loser Effects in Collegiate Baseball and Softball Doubleheaders

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past experiences have a considerable impact on the success of future interactions across the animal kingdom. Known as winner and loser effects, victors of prior contests tend to have an increased chance of future success while losers are likely to experience additional failure. These effects are in part due to differential endocrine responses among competitors following initial bouts, with winners benefiting from subsequent increases in testosterone (T) and losers being disadvantaged by reductions in T and heightened stress hormones. Now well documented across a range of human competitions, sporting events provide an ideal setting to explore this biological phenomenon. This study uses the perspective of winner and loser effects to study the pattern of outcomes observed in consecutive baseball and softball games played in the same day (i.e., doubleheaders) at the collegiate level. Using archival data from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), we show that the distribution of winning and losing within these contests is not random. Consistent with a previous report on Major League Baseball (MLB), collegiate baseball and softball doubleheaders are more likely to be swept (i.e., one team winning both games) than split (i.e., each team winning and losing once), and the margin of victory in the first game was positive predictor of this outcome. While there were no differences between the strength of these effects between baseball and softball, both collegiate sports resulted in greater proportion of sweeps than in MLB. A residency effect was also observed, whereby victors of sweeps were more often the home team. This home field advantage was stronger for collegiate baseball compared to softball and the MLB. This report adds to a large comparative literature on winner and loser effects, and provides insight into the dynamics that modulate human performance in high-level athletic competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, G., & Elwood, R. W. (2008). Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 529–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateup, H. S., Booth, A., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Granger, D. A. (2002). Testosterone, cortisol, and women's competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, P. C., Dabbs Jr., J. M., Fielden, J. A., & Lutter, C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65(1), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Shelley, G., Mazur, A., Tharp, G., & Kittok, R. (1989). Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 23(4), 556–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré, J. M., & Putnam, S. K. (2010). Watching a previous victory produces an increase in testosterone among elite hockey players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(3), 475–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré, J. M., Campbell, J. A., Lozoya, E., Goetz, S. M., & Welker, K. M. (2013). Changes in testosterone mediate the effect of winning on subsequent aggressive behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2034–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, I. D., Bartolomeo, C., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1994). Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning? Animal Behaviour, 48(2), 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A., & Reeve, H. K. (2014). Winning, losing, and reaching out. Behavioral Ecology, 25(4), 675–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, R. L., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2002). Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269(1494), 943–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. A., & Kurlander, L. S. (2010). Women's intercollegiate volleyball and tennis: Effects of warm-up, competition, and practice on saliva levels of cortisol and testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 58(4), 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. A., & O'Neal, J. L. (2009). Oral contraceptives decrease saliva testosterone but do not affect the rise in testosterone associated with athletic competition. Hormones and Behavior, 56(2), 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. A., Wetzel, K., & Wyner, D. R. (2006). Intercollegiate soccer: saliva cortisol and testosterone are elevated during competition, and testosterone is related to status and social connectedness with team mates. Physiology & Behavior, 87, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, M., & Leimar, O. (1987). Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 127(2), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuxjager, M. J., Mast, G., Becker, E. A., & Marler, C. A. (2009). The ‘home advantage’ is necessary for a full winner effect and changes in post-encounter testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 56(2), 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, A. C., & Eldakar, O. T. (2014). Winner and loser effects in major league baseball double headers. Human Ethology Bulletin, 29(4), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Bono, E., Salvador, A., Serrano, M. A., & Ricarte, J. (1999). Testosterone, cortisol, and mood in a sports team competition. Hormones and Behavior, 35(1), 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. L. (1969). On the incidence of swept double-headers. The American Statistician, 23(5), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y., & Wolf, L. L. (1999). The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Animal Behaviour, 57(4), 903–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y., Lee, I. H., & Lu, C. K. (2009). Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(9), 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1819–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, M., Aguilar, R., & Alvero-Cruz, J. R. (2012). Effects of victory and defeat on testosterone and cortisol response to competition: evidence for same response patterns in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1577–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumovic, M. M., Elias, D. O., Sivalinghem, S., Mason, A. C., & Andrade, M. C. (2010). Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behavioral Ecology, 21(2), 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. J., & Wiklund, C. (2004). Residency effects in animal contests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1707–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, K. T., Granger, D. A., & Booth, A. (2005). Gender differences in testosterone and cortisol response to competition. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(1), 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., López-Sepulcre, A., & Morrell, L. J. (2006). From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. The American Naturalist, 167(6), 901–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liening, S. H., Stanton, S. J., Saini, E. K., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Salivary testosterone, cortisol, and progesterone: two-week stability, interhormone correlations, and effects of time of day, menstrual cycle, and oral contraceptive use on steroid hormone levels. Physiology & Behavior, 99(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, C. A., Oyegbile, T. O., Plavicki, J., & Trainor, B. C. (2005). Response to Wingfield's commentary on “A continuing saga: The role of testosterone in aggression”. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 256–258.

  • Mazur, A., Booth, A., & Dabbs Jr., J. M. (1992). Testosterone and chess competition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 70–77.

  • Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones and Behavior, 50(5), 684–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. H., Jones, A. C., & Josephs, R. A. (2008). The social endocrinology of dominance: basal testosterone predicts cortisol changes and behavior following victory and defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. H., Snyder, N. A., Knight, E. L., & Lassetter, B. (2015). Close versus decisive victory moderates the effect of testosterone change on competitive decisions and task enjoyment. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1(3), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo, L. M., Pepper, J. W., Reid, B. J., & Maley, C. C. (2006). Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Nature Reviews Cancer, 6(12), 924–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1998). The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, N., & Wolfson, S. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiology & Behavior, 78(2), 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeier, M., & Schmitz, B. (2003). Recognition of dominance in the big-clawed snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis Say 1818) part II: analysis of signal modality. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 36(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R. F., McGregor, P. K., & Latruffe, C. (1998). Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1401), 1045–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, R. F., Silva, A., & Canário, A. V. (2009a). Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1665), 2249–2256.

  • Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Oliveira, R. F. (2009b). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(7), 1056–1064.

  • Oyegbile, T. O., & Marler, C. A. (2005). Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, L., & Coates, J. (2017). Winner and loser effects in human competitions. Evidence from equally matched tennis players. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 530–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1981). Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Animal Behaviour, 29(1), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Comparison of home advantage in men's and women's football leagues in Europe. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(sup1), S77–S83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rillich, J., & Stevenson, P. A. (2011). Winning fights induces hyperaggression via the action of the biogenic amine octopamine in crickets. PLoS One, 6(12), e28891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte, C., Taborsky, M., & Brinkhof, M. W. (2006). What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(1), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuett, G. W., Harlow, H. J., Rose, J. D., Van Kirk, E. A., & Murdoch, W. J. (1996). Levels of plasma corticosterone and testosterone in male copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) following staged fights. Hormones and Behavior, 30(1), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulteiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Torges, C. M., Pang, J. S., Villacorta, M. A., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Effects of implicit power motivation on men’s and women’s implicit learning and testosterone changes after social victory or defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, B. C., Bird, I. M., & Marler, C. A. (2004). Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Hormones and Behavior, 45(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Ability- vs. chance-determined competition outcomes: effects on testosterone in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 90, 634–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, M. E. (1997). Experience influences male–male contests in the spiderArgyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, D., Barton, R. A., & Hill, R. A. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on sport and competition. In Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 290–307) Ed. S. C. Roberts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wingfield, J. C. (1994). Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Hormones and Behavior, 28(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr., A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The ‘challenge hypothesis’: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilioli, S., & Watson, N. V. (2014). Testosterone across successive competitions: evidence for a ‘winner effect’in humans? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 47, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew C. Gallup.

Additional information

Andrew C. Gallup and Omar Tonsi Eldakar are co-first authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallup, A.C., Eldakar, O.T., Schonning, M. et al. Winner and Loser Effects in Collegiate Baseball and Softball Doubleheaders. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 4, 108–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0082-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0082-z

Keywords

Navigation