Abstract
Past experiences have a considerable impact on the success of future interactions across the animal kingdom. Known as winner and loser effects, victors of prior contests tend to have an increased chance of future success while losers are likely to experience additional failure. These effects are in part due to differential endocrine responses among competitors following initial bouts, with winners benefiting from subsequent increases in testosterone (T) and losers being disadvantaged by reductions in T and heightened stress hormones. Now well documented across a range of human competitions, sporting events provide an ideal setting to explore this biological phenomenon. This study uses the perspective of winner and loser effects to study the pattern of outcomes observed in consecutive baseball and softball games played in the same day (i.e., doubleheaders) at the collegiate level. Using archival data from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), we show that the distribution of winning and losing within these contests is not random. Consistent with a previous report on Major League Baseball (MLB), collegiate baseball and softball doubleheaders are more likely to be swept (i.e., one team winning both games) than split (i.e., each team winning and losing once), and the margin of victory in the first game was positive predictor of this outcome. While there were no differences between the strength of these effects between baseball and softball, both collegiate sports resulted in greater proportion of sweeps than in MLB. A residency effect was also observed, whereby victors of sweeps were more often the home team. This home field advantage was stronger for collegiate baseball compared to softball and the MLB. This report adds to a large comparative literature on winner and loser effects, and provides insight into the dynamics that modulate human performance in high-level athletic competition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319–345.
Arnott, G., & Elwood, R. W. (2008). Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 76(3), 529–542.
Bateup, H. S., Booth, A., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Granger, D. A. (2002). Testosterone, cortisol, and women's competition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 181–192.
Bernhardt, P. C., Dabbs Jr., J. M., Fielden, J. A., & Lutter, C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65(1), 59–62.
Booth, A., Shelley, G., Mazur, A., Tharp, G., & Kittok, R. (1989). Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 23(4), 556–571.
Carré, J. M., & Putnam, S. K. (2010). Watching a previous victory produces an increase in testosterone among elite hockey players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(3), 475–479.
Carré, J. M., Campbell, J. A., Lozoya, E., Goetz, S. M., & Welker, K. M. (2013). Changes in testosterone mediate the effect of winning on subsequent aggressive behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2034–2041.
Chase, I. D., Bartolomeo, C., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1994). Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning? Animal Behaviour, 48(2), 393–400.
Courneya, K. S., & Carron, A. V. (1992). The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 13–27.
Dugatkin, L. A., & Reeve, H. K. (2014). Winning, losing, and reaching out. Behavioral Ecology, 25(4), 675–679.
Earley, R. L., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2002). Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269(1494), 943–952.
Edwards, D. A., & Kurlander, L. S. (2010). Women's intercollegiate volleyball and tennis: Effects of warm-up, competition, and practice on saliva levels of cortisol and testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 58(4), 606–613.
Edwards, D. A., & O'Neal, J. L. (2009). Oral contraceptives decrease saliva testosterone but do not affect the rise in testosterone associated with athletic competition. Hormones and Behavior, 56(2), 195–198.
Edwards, D. A., Wetzel, K., & Wyner, D. R. (2006). Intercollegiate soccer: saliva cortisol and testosterone are elevated during competition, and testosterone is related to status and social connectedness with team mates. Physiology & Behavior, 87, 135–143.
Enquist, M., & Leimar, O. (1987). Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 127(2), 187–205.
Fuxjager, M. J., Mast, G., Becker, E. A., & Marler, C. A. (2009). The ‘home advantage’ is necessary for a full winner effect and changes in post-encounter testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 56(2), 214–219.
Gallup, A. C., & Eldakar, O. T. (2014). Winner and loser effects in major league baseball double headers. Human Ethology Bulletin, 29(4), 18–27.
Gonzalez-Bono, E., Salvador, A., Serrano, M. A., & Ricarte, J. (1999). Testosterone, cortisol, and mood in a sports team competition. Hormones and Behavior, 35(1), 55–62.
Goodman, M. L. (1969). On the incidence of swept double-headers. The American Statistician, 23(5), 15–17.
Hsu, Y., & Wolf, L. L. (1999). The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Animal Behaviour, 57(4), 903–910.
Hsu, Y., Lee, I. H., & Lu, C. K. (2009). Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(9), 1247–1257.
Jamieson, J. P. (2010). The home field advantage in athletics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1819–1848.
Jiménez, M., Aguilar, R., & Alvero-Cruz, J. R. (2012). Effects of victory and defeat on testosterone and cortisol response to competition: evidence for same response patterns in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(9), 1577–1581.
Kasumovic, M. M., Elias, D. O., Sivalinghem, S., Mason, A. C., & Andrade, M. C. (2010). Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects. Behavioral Ecology, 21(2), 404–409.
Kemp, D. J., & Wiklund, C. (2004). Residency effects in animal contests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 1707–1712.
Kivlighan, K. T., Granger, D. A., & Booth, A. (2005). Gender differences in testosterone and cortisol response to competition. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(1), 58–71.
Kokko, H., López-Sepulcre, A., & Morrell, L. J. (2006). From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. The American Naturalist, 167(6), 901–912.
Liening, S. H., Stanton, S. J., Saini, E. K., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Salivary testosterone, cortisol, and progesterone: two-week stability, interhormone correlations, and effects of time of day, menstrual cycle, and oral contraceptive use on steroid hormone levels. Physiology & Behavior, 99(1), 8–16.
Marler, C. A., Oyegbile, T. O., Plavicki, J., & Trainor, B. C. (2005). Response to Wingfield's commentary on “A continuing saga: The role of testosterone in aggression”. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 256–258.
Mazur, A., Booth, A., & Dabbs Jr., J. M. (1992). Testosterone and chess competition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 70–77.
Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones and Behavior, 50(5), 684–692.
Mehta, P. H., Jones, A. C., & Josephs, R. A. (2008). The social endocrinology of dominance: basal testosterone predicts cortisol changes and behavior following victory and defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1078.
Mehta, P. H., Snyder, N. A., Knight, E. L., & Lassetter, B. (2015). Close versus decisive victory moderates the effect of testosterone change on competitive decisions and task enjoyment. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1(3), 291–311.
Merlo, L. M., Pepper, J. W., Reid, B. J., & Maley, C. C. (2006). Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Nature Reviews Cancer, 6(12), 924–935.
Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1998). The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neave, N., & Wolfson, S. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage’. Physiology & Behavior, 78(2), 269–275.
Obermeier, M., & Schmitz, B. (2003). Recognition of dominance in the big-clawed snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis Say 1818) part II: analysis of signal modality. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 36(1), 17–29.
Oliveira, R. F., McGregor, P. K., & Latruffe, C. (1998). Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1401), 1045–1049.
Oliveira, R. F., Silva, A., & Canário, A. V. (2009a). Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1665), 2249–2256.
Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Oliveira, R. F. (2009b). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(7), 1056–1064.
Oyegbile, T. O., & Marler, C. A. (2005). Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 259–267.
Page, L., & Coates, J. (2017). Winner and loser effects in human competitions. Evidence from equally matched tennis players. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 530–535.
Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223–243.
Parker, G. A., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1981). Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Animal Behaviour, 29(1), 221–240.
Pollard, R., & Gómez, M. A. (2014). Comparison of home advantage in men's and women's football leagues in Europe. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(sup1), S77–S83.
Rillich, J., & Stevenson, P. A. (2011). Winning fights induces hyperaggression via the action of the biogenic amine octopamine in crickets. PLoS One, 6(12), e28891.
Rutte, C., Taborsky, M., & Brinkhof, M. W. (2006). What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(1), 16–21.
Schuett, G. W., Harlow, H. J., Rose, J. D., Van Kirk, E. A., & Murdoch, W. J. (1996). Levels of plasma corticosterone and testosterone in male copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix) following staged fights. Hormones and Behavior, 30(1), 60–68.
Schulteiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Torges, C. M., Pang, J. S., Villacorta, M. A., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Effects of implicit power motivation on men’s and women’s implicit learning and testosterone changes after social victory or defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 174–188.
Smith, J. M. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Trainor, B. C., Bird, I. M., & Marler, C. A. (2004). Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Hormones and Behavior, 45(2), 115–121.
van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Ability- vs. chance-determined competition outcomes: effects on testosterone in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 90, 634–642.
Whitehouse, M. E. (1997). Experience influences male–male contests in the spiderArgyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 913–923.
Wiedemann, D., Barton, R. A., & Hill, R. A. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on sport and competition. In Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 290–307) Ed. S. C. Roberts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wingfield, J. C. (1994). Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna. Hormones and Behavior, 28(1), 1–15.
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr., A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The ‘challenge hypothesis’: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.
Zilioli, S., & Watson, N. V. (2014). Testosterone across successive competitions: evidence for a ‘winner effect’in humans? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 47, 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Andrew C. Gallup and Omar Tonsi Eldakar are co-first authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallup, A.C., Eldakar, O.T., Schonning, M. et al. Winner and Loser Effects in Collegiate Baseball and Softball Doubleheaders. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 4, 108–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0082-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0082-z